H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pam Whytcross vs Linda Geeves H2H: 2-0
Pam Whytcross holds a 2–0 lead over Linda Geeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Whytcross leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Whytcross won the 1979 Manchester third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1979* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Pam Whytcross | 6-2 6-2 | Linda Geeves | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1974* | Chichester | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Pam Whytcross | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Linda Geeves | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Whytcross | #154 | #150 | — | 1,630 | 66 | 116 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Linda Geeves | — | — | — | 1,613 | 44 | 61 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Whytcross | Linda Geeves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 2–16 | 11.1% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |