H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Pam Whytcross vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 0-2
Pilar Vasquez holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Whytcross in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1982 Tokyo Japan Open semifinal 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1982* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Pilar Vasquez | 6-4 6-0 | Pam Whytcross | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1981* | Curitiba | WTA 250 | R16 | — | Pilar Vasquez | 6-1 6-3 | Pam Whytcross | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Whytcross | #154 | #150 | — | 1,630 | 66 | 116 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Whytcross | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1972 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1973 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1977 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1978 | 2–16 | 11.1% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1979 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1980 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1983 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |