H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pam Whytcross vs Sara Gomer H2H: 1-0
Pam Whytcross holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Gomer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Whytcross leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Whytcross won the 1982 Beckenham third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 72
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1982* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Pam Whytcross | 6-4 6-4 | Sara Gomer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Whytcross | #154 | #150 | — | 1,630 | 66 | 116 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pam Whytcross | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 2–16 | 11.1% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1983 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |