H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pam Whytcross vs Zenda Liess H2H: 0-2

Zenda Liess holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Whytcross in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Zenda Liess leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Zenda Liess won the 1978 Indianapolis round of 32 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pam Whytcross
AUS Age 72
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Zenda Liess
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zenda Liess 6-0 6-4 Pam Whytcross Match data Aug 10, 1978* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Zenda Liess 6-3 3-6 6-2 Pam Whytcross Match data Apr 2, 1978* R16 Stuart WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pam Whytcross #154 #150 — 1,638 66 116 36.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Zenda Liess — — — 1,743 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pam Whytcross Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1974 7–7 50.0% — 1,554 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,573 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–4 63.6% — 1,668 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1977 4–13 23.5% — 1,619 0 0
18 1972 1–3 25.0% — 1,486 0 0 1978 16–17 48.5% — 1,742 0 0
19 1973 4–10 28.6% — 1,429 0 0 1979 3–11 21.4% — 1,662 0 0
20 1974 6–7 46.2% — 1,489 0 0 1980 1–4 20.0% — 1,610 0 0
21 1975 1–6 14.3% — 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1976 4–8 33.3% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1977 10–11 47.6% — 1,589 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1978 2–16 11.1% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1979 7–5 58.3% — 1,541 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1980 11–12 47.8% — 1,601 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,542 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,529 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1983 2–8 20.0% — 1,487 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 1984 1–6 14.3% — 1,454 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pam Whytcross Zenda Liess
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0%
18 1972 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1978 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1973 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1974 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1980 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1977 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1979 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1980 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1984 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 12 19 36.8% 19 34 53 35.8% 32 54 86 37.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — 9 19 28 32.1% 23 24 47 48.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 13 18 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pam Whytcross Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1554 119.5 — — — — — -29 — 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.30
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1574 114.9 — — — — — +15 — 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.13
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1669 124.1 — — — — — +28 — 59.1% +1.09 1–1 — — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1619 124.4 — — — — -92 +63 — 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.82
18 1972 1486 96.3 — — — — — — +42 33.3% -2.33 0–1 2–0 — +0.17 1978 1743 135.7 — — — — -78 -37 — 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.24
19 1973 1429 97.5 — — — — — +45 +39 26.7% -1.43 2–0 0–1 — +1.59 1979 1662 120.1 — — — — -29 -5 — 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.45
20 1974 1489 106.7 — — — — — +11 +24 44.8% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.96 1980 1610 95.3 — — — — -77 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
21 1975 1444 92.3 — — — — — — +29 9.1% -3.09 0–1 — — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1976 1490 101.8 — — — — — — +64 35.7% -1.25 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1977 1589 126.9 — — — — — -56 +3 45.8% -0.35 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1978 1485 100.8 — — — — +59 +20 -10 19.5% -2.54 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1979 1542 109.9 — — — — — — -27 57.7% +0.62 1–1 — — +2.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1980 1602 112.6 — — — — — -28 -56 48.9% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 +0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1981 1542 107.9 — — — — — — +35 48.9% +0.04 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 96.9 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1982 1530 97.2 — — — — +31 -21 +68 41.7% -1.04 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +1.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1983 1487 102.6 — — — — +71 +41 +82 29.2% -1.46 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1984 1454 92.1 — — — — +43 +72 — 14.3% -3.07 — 1–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1638 107.7 — — — — +48 0 +11 38.6% -0.98 19–27 (41%) 16–14 (53%) 99.2 +5.75 — 1744 131.4 — — — — -71 +6 — 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.