H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pamela Brand vs M Slocombe H2H: 1-0

Pamela Brand holds a 1–0 lead over M Slocombe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pamela Brand leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pamela Brand won the 1969 Perth round of 16 6-0 6-0.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pamela Brand 6-0 6-0 M Slocombe Match data Jan 5, 1969* R16 Perth WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pamela Brand 1,516 1 3 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
M Slocombe 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Pamela Brand M Slocombe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1969 1–3 25.0% 1,478 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Pamela Brand M Slocombe
Yr Grass Yr Grass
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1969 1 3 4 25.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 1 3 4 25.0% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Pamela Brand M Slocombe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1969 1478 99.5 +29 33.3% -1.44 0–1 +0.53 1969 1484 88.4 0.0% -6.00 +0.22
Career 1516 99.7 +29 33.3% -1.44 0–1 +13.25 Career 1500 93.9 0.0% -6.00 +22.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.