H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Pamela Jung vs Akemi Nishiya H2H: 1-1

Pamela Jung and Akemi Nishiya are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Akemi Nishiya won the 1988 Wellington round of 64 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pamela Jung
USA Age 63
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Akemi Nishiya
JPN Age 61

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Akemi Nishiya 7-5 6-4 Pamela Jung Match data Feb 3, 1988* R64 Wellington WTA 250 Hard
Pamela Jung 7-6 4-6 6-1 Akemi Nishiya Match data Jan 27, 1988* R64 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pamela Jung — — — 1,525 6 14 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Akemi Nishiya — — — 1,537 10 30 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pamela Jung Akemi Nishiya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,466 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,438 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,432 0 0
22 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,426 0 0 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,412 0 0
23 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,433 0 0 1988 5–6 45.5% — 1,460 0 0
24 1988 2–4 33.3% — 1,418 0 0 1989 5–10 33.3% — 1,480 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1990 0–4 0.0% — 1,450 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% — 1,419 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pamela Jung Akemi Nishiya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — 9 19 28 32.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pamela Jung Akemi Nishiya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1981 1509 110.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1466 92.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.56 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1438 92.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.07
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1432 102.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.04
22 1986 1426 91.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.42 1987 1412 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.15
23 1987 1433 96.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.28 1988 1461 102.7 — — — — +69 — — 48.0% -0.40 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.90
24 1988 1418 94.5 — — — — +64 — — 33.3% -0.93 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.83 1989 1480 111.9 — — — — +60 — — 31.3% -1.63 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.75
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1450 101.2 — — — — +48 — — 11.1% -2.89 0–1 — — -0.12
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1419 96.0 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.19
Career — 1526 93.9 — — — — +64 — — 29.8% -1.17 5–2 (71%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 +7.80 — 1537 102.9 — — — — +62 — — 29.2% -1.62 3–8 (27%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 +4.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.