H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Paola Suarez vs Anne Miller H2H: 0-2
Anne Miller holds a 2–0 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Miller leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Miller won the 1996 Canadian Indoor third round 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 49
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1996* | Canadian Indoor | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Miller | 6-0 7-6 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Anne Miller | 6-2 6-2 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Anne Miller | — | — | — | 1,701 | 29 | 53 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paola Suarez | Anne Miller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–13 | 18.8% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |