H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Paola Suarez vs Catalina Castano H2H: 1-1
Paola Suarez and Catalina Castano are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2006 Seoul fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2006* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Paola Suarez | 6-4 6-3 | Catalina Castano | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Catalina Castano | 7-5 6-3 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paola Suarez | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |