H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Paola Suarez vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 1-0
Paola Suarez holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Golarsa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paola Suarez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 1996 Rome second round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1996* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 7-6 6-1 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paola Suarez | Laura Golarsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |