H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Paola Suarez vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Paola Suarez holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paola Suarez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 1996 US Open first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Paola Suarez | 6-4 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Paola Suarez | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |