H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pascale Etchemendy vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 0-2
Bettina Fulco holds a 2–0 lead over Pascale Etchemendy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Fulco leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1992 Rome second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 1992* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-3 6-3 | Pascale Etchemendy | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1986* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Bettina Fulco | 6-3 6-1 | Pascale Etchemendy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascale Etchemendy | #498 | #132 | 8 | 1,558 | 15 | 35 | 30.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pascale Etchemendy | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #226 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #163 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |