H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Pascale Paradis Mangon vs Halle Cioffi H2H: 1-0
Pascale Paradis Mangon holds a 1–0 lead over Halle Cioffi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pascale Paradis Mangon leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pascale Paradis Mangon won the 1989 Los Angeles second round 6-0 4-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 1989* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Pascale Paradis Mangon | 6-0 4-6 7-6 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | — | — | — | 1,817 | 139 | 157 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pascale Paradis Mangon | Halle Cioffi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1984 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–16 | 23.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 19–12 | 61.3% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |