H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Pascale Paradis Mangon vs Joanne Russell H2H: 0-1

Joanne Russell holds a 1–0 lead over Pascale Paradis Mangon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joanne Russell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joanne Russell won the 1984 Indianapolis Indoors final 7-6 6-2.

FRA Age 60 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joanne Russell 7-6 6-2 Pascale Paradis Mangon Match data Feb 5, 1984* F Indianapolis Indoors WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pascale Paradis Mangon — — — 1,817 139 157 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Joanne Russell — — — 1,938 205 200 50.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pascale Paradis Mangon Joanne Russell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 8–6 57.1% — 1,597 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1984 25–21 54.3% — 1,795 0 1 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,544 0 0
19 1985 18–20 47.4% — 1,732 0 1 1974 5–2 71.4% — 1,579 0 1
20 1986 5–16 23.8% — 1,591 0 1 1975 17–12 58.6% — 1,691 0 2
21 1987 7–14 33.3% — 1,573 0 1 1976 16–14 53.3% — 1,818 0 2
22 1988 19–12 61.3% — 1,758 0 1 1977 19–16 54.3% — 1,881 0 2
23 1989 4–10 28.6% — 1,678 0 1 1978 13–16 44.8% — 1,860 0 2
24 1990 3–9 25.0% — 1,591 0 1 1979 6–10 37.5% — 1,778 0 3
25 1991 13–14 48.1% — 1,629 0 1 1980 32–23 58.2% — 1,876 0 3
26 1992 21–17 55.3% — 1,728 0 1 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,808 0 3
27 1993 16–16 50.0% — 1,675 0 1 1982 20–22 47.6% — 1,826 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1983 11–11 50.0% — 1,800 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1984 27–17 61.4% — 1,839 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1985 7–20 25.9% — 1,613 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1986 2–10 16.7% — 1,535 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,515 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pascale Paradis Mangon Joanne Russell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1974 — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1976 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 6 12 50.0%
22 1988 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 1977 6 4 10 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
23 1989 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 10 17 41.2%
24 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1980 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
26 1992 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 12 10 22 54.5%
27 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 13 12 25 52.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 52 62 114 45.6% 13 28 41 31.7% 34 30 64 53.1% 40 37 77 51.9% — 45 43 88 51.1% 50 48 98 51.0% 22 25 47 46.8% 70 76 146 47.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pascale Paradis Mangon Joanne Russell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1484 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1477 102.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1598 124.9 — — — — +33 +6 +15 54.5% +0.45 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1795 140.0 — — — — -60 -200 -20 51.4% +0.27 11–8 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.9 +0.91 1973 1544 116.2 — — — — — — — 58.3% +0.92 1–1 0–1 — -0.41
19 1985 1732 132.1 — — — — -47 -134 +46 46.3% -0.15 11–8 (58%) 7–9 (44%) 101.1 -1.07 1974 1580 104.9 — — — — — +12 — 62.5% +0.50 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.22
20 1986 1592 109.3 — — — — +12 -70 — 35.2% -0.81 3–9 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 89.6 +0.67 1975 1691 132.4 — — — — -81 -39 — 58.0% +0.36 5–6 (45%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.58
21 1987 1573 113.2 — — — — +27 — — 37.0% -1.02 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.5 +0.44 1976 1818 140.3 — — — — -130 -145 -154 49.2% +0.11 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.2 -1.98
22 1988 1759 137.4 — — — — -51 -335 +77 58.9% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 0–1 — +0.74 1977 1881 149.7 — — — — -96 -102 -216 53.8% +0.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.8 -3.42
23 1989 1679 123.2 — — — — -19 — — 33.3% -0.97 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.95 1978 1861 148.0 — — — — -127 -34 -152 46.4% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -3.83
24 1990 1591 108.4 — — — — +9 — — 32.3% -1.03 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 +0.11 1979 1778 131.4 — — — — -83 +73 -118 41.9% -0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.9 -2.25
25 1991 1630 128.1 — — — — +14 — +137 50.8% +0.27 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +0.74 1980 1876 145.0 — — — — -44 -42 -190 50.8% +0.14 16–2 (89%) 4–4 (50%) 113.6 -3.45
26 1992 1729 133.9 — — — — +17 -308 +21 54.5% +0.28 6–6 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.3 +1.14 1981 1809 138.7 — — — — +28 +23 -109 51.3% -0.02 13–8 (62%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.54
27 1993 1675 130.6 — — — — -11 -173 +95 50.7% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 +0.13 1982 1826 142.1 — — — — +50 -82 -42 44.9% -0.29 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.5 -1.95
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1800 134.4 — — — — +57 -16 — 49.0% -0.25 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -2.16
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1840 128.5 — — — — +82 -129 -109 57.8% +0.28 9–5 (64%) 9–3 (75%) 105.8 +2.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1614 112.1 — — — — +50 +14 +71 26.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 0–6 (0%) 95.4 +0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1535 105.7 — — — — +63 +35 — 30.0% -1.47 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.27
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19
Career — 1818 135.5 — — — — -9 -167 +48 47.9% -0.04 54–60 (47%) 22–35 (39%) 92.9 +1.34 — 1939 143.7 — — — — -12 -35 -120 48.9% -0.06 79–52 (60%) 45–42 (52%) 108.6 -4.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.