H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Pascale Paradis Mangon vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 1-1
Pascale Paradis Mangon and Judith Wiesner are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pascale Paradis Mangon leads 1–0 on carpet, while Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1992 Strasbourg fourth round 2-6 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 1992* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | Pascale Paradis Mangon | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1992* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Pascale Paradis Mangon | 6-3 6-3 | Judith Wiesner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | — | — | — | 1,817 | 139 | 157 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pascale Paradis Mangon | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–16 | 23.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 19–12 | 61.3% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |