H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pascale Paradis Mangon vs Julie Richardson H2H: 3-0
Pascale Paradis Mangon holds a 3–0 lead over Julie Richardson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pascale Paradis Mangon leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pascale Paradis Mangon won the 1992 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1992* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Pascale Paradis Mangon | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Julie Richardson | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1992* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Pascale Paradis Mangon | 6-4 6-4 | Julie Richardson | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1987* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pascale Paradis Mangon | 6-2 7-6 | Julie Richardson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | — | — | — | 1,817 | 139 | 157 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Julie Richardson | #643 | #102 | 9 | 1,575 | 28 | 65 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pascale Paradis Mangon | Julie Richardson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #162 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–16 | 23.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #157 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #103 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 19–12 | 61.3% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #257 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #137 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #556 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #157 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #301 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #367 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |