H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Pascale Paradis Mangon vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-2

Lori Mcneil holds a 2–0 lead over Pascale Paradis Mangon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1991 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-4.

Age 60 Right-Handed
H2H
0 2
2 main draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 1991* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Lori Mcneil #24 6-3 6-4 Pascale Paradis Mangon Match data
Feb 26, 1987* Key Biscayne WTA 250 R32 Hard Lori Mcneil #14 6-2 6-3 Pascale Paradis Mangon Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pascale Paradis Mangon 1,817 139 157 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pascale Paradis Mangon Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,476 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
17 1983 8–6 57.1% 1,598 0 1 1981 2–0 100.0% 1,520 0 1
18 1984 25–21 54.3% 1,794 0 1 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,503 0 1
19 1985 18–20 47.4% 1,732 0 1 1983 6–5 54.5% 1,569 0 1
20 1986 5–16 23.8% 1,590 0 1 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1987 7–14 33.3% 1,572 0 1 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1988 19–12 61.3% 1,758 0 1 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1989 4–10 28.6% 1,679 0 1 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1990 3–9 25.0% 1,591 0 1 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1991 13–14 48.1% 1,630 0 1 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1992 21–17 55.3% 1,728 0 1 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1993 16–16 50.0% 1,674 0 1 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11