H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Pascale Paradis Mangon vs Maja Zivec Skulj H2H: 1-0
Pascale Paradis Mangon holds a 1–0 lead over Maja Zivec Skulj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pascale Paradis Mangon leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pascale Paradis Mangon won the 1992 Cesena third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 52
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1992* | Cesena | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pascale Paradis Mangon | 6-4 6-1 | Maja Zivec Skulj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | — | — | — | 1,817 | 139 | 157 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maja Zivec Skulj | — | — | — | 1,500 | 11 | 30 | 26.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pascale Paradis Mangon | Maja Zivec Skulj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 25–21 | 54.3% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 5–16 | 23.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 19–12 | 61.3% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–17 | 55.3% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |