H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Pascale Paradis Mangon vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-0

Pascale Paradis Mangon holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pascale Paradis Mangon leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pascale Paradis Mangon won the 1992 Linz Open semifinal 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pascale Paradis Mangon
FRA Age 60 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pascale Paradis Mangon 6-2 7-5 Sandra Cecchini #28 Match data Feb 15, 1992* SF Linz Open Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Pascale Paradis Mangon 6-4 5-7 6-4 Sandra Cecchini #114 Match data Feb 4, 1984* QF Indianapolis Indoors WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pascale Paradis Mangon — — — 1,817 139 157 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pascale Paradis Mangon Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1983 8–6 57.1% — 1,597 0 1 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1984 25–21 54.3% — 1,794 0 1 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1985 18–20 47.4% — 1,732 0 1 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1986 5–16 23.8% — 1,591 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1987 7–14 33.3% — 1,572 0 1 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1988 19–12 61.3% — 1,758 0 1 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1989 4–10 28.6% — 1,678 0 1 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1990 3–9 25.0% — 1,591 0 1 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1991 13–14 48.1% — 1,629 0 1 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1992 21–17 55.3% — 1,728 0 1 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1993 16–16 50.0% — 1,675 0 1 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 — — — — — — — 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pascale Paradis Mangon Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1983 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1988 8 4 12 66.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1989 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1991 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1992 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 52 62 114 45.6% 13 28 41 31.7% 34 30 64 53.1% 40 37 77 51.9% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pascale Paradis Mangon Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1980 1484 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1477 102.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1983 1597 124.8 — — — — +35 +6 +16 54.5% +0.45 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.06 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1984 1795 139.8 — — — — -61 -201 -20 51.4% +0.27 11–8 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.8 +0.80 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1985 1732 131.9 — — — — -46 -134 +44 46.3% -0.15 11–8 (58%) 7–9 (44%) 101.1 -1.06 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1986 1591 109.2 — — — — +14 -69 — 35.2% -0.81 3–9 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 89.5 +0.75 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1987 1573 113.1 — — — — +26 — — 37.0% -1.02 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.5 +0.50 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1988 1758 137.3 — — — — -51 -334 +78 58.9% +0.55 6–5 (55%) 0–1 — +0.75 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1989 1678 123.2 — — — — -19 — — 33.3% -0.97 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.02 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1990 1591 108.4 — — — — +8 — — 32.3% -1.03 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 97.2 +0.11 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1991 1629 128.1 — — — — +15 — +138 50.8% +0.27 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +0.74 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1992 1729 133.8 — — — — +18 -308 +21 54.5% +0.28 6–6 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.3 +1.14 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1993 1675 130.6 — — — — -11 -173 +93 50.7% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 2–1 (67%) 99.4 +0.13 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1818 135.4 — — — — -9 -167 +47 47.9% -0.04 54–60 (47%) 22–35 (39%) 92.9 +1.35 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.