H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Patricia Bostrom vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 0-2

Lea Antonoplis holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Bostrom in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1977 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Bostrom
USA Age 74
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Lea Antonoplis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Antonoplis 6-3 6-4 Patricia Bostrom Match data Jun 22, 1977* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lea Antonoplis 7-5 6-3 Patricia Bostrom Match data Mar 25, 1977* QF San Antonio WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Bostrom — — — 1,674 57 88 39.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lea Antonoplis #599 #66 6 1,770 126 176 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Bostrom Lea Antonoplis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1973 8–3 72.7% — 1,578 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,532 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 3–4 42.9% — 1,560 0 0
17 1969 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1976 7–6 53.8% — 1,610 0 0
18 1970 1–4 20.0% — 1,483 0 0 1977 6–4 60.0% — 1,652 0 0
19 1971 0–4 0.0% — 1,451 0 0 1978 17–20 45.9% — 1,713 0 0
20 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,499 0 1 1979 11–13 45.8% — 1,722 0 1
21 1973 16–23 41.0% — 1,587 0 1 1980 14–7 66.7% — 1,733 0 2
22 1974 12–10 54.5% — 1,654 0 1 1981 9–11 45.0% — 1,717 0 2
23 1975 5–6 45.5% — 1,625 0 1 1982 8–18 30.8% — 1,631 0 2
24 1976 4–7 36.4% — 1,624 0 1 1983 6–13 31.6% — 1,567 0 2
25 1977 8–9 47.1% — 1,618 0 1 1984 8–11 42.1% #71 1,582 0 2
26 1978 3–16 15.8% — 1,516 0 1 1985 14–21 40.0% #66 1,570 0 2
27 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,504 0 1 1986 2–14 12.5% #176 1,458 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1987 3–9 25.0% #163 1,412 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1988 5–9 35.7% #142 1,453 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1989 3–7 30.0% #210 1,446 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #599 1,430 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Bostrom Lea Antonoplis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1970 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1977 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1971 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1972 5 2 7 71.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1973 4 6 10 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 1980 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1974 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%
24 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
25 1977 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1978 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
27 1979 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 22 20 42 52.4% 8 26 34 23.5% 14 28 42 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% — 45 72 117 38.5% 8 13 21 38.1% 48 50 98 49.0% 12 34 46 26.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Bostrom Lea Antonoplis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1579 109.5 — — — — +107 — — 69.6% +0.70 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +3.55
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1532 101.9 — — — — +96 — +11 41.2% -0.65 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.36
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1560 115.7 — — — — +137 — — 41.2% -0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.23
17 1969 1503 100.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.10 1976 1610 115.6 — — — — +32 -28 -16 48.0% -0.16 1–0 0–1 — +0.98
18 1970 1484 99.6 — — — — — +32 — 20.0% -2.60 — — — -0.16 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — -3 — -31 62.5% +0.67 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.94
19 1971 1452 99.7 — — — — — — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.15 1978 1713 131.8 — — — — -75 — +41 49.4% -0.07 9–8 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.2 +1.01
20 1972 1500 99.4 — — — — +123 -57 -9 46.9% -0.56 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +2.43 1979 1722 130.7 — — — — -96 — +9 47.5% -0.54 5–6 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 101.3 -0.92
21 1973 1588 114.9 — — — — +7 -115 -22 39.3% -0.73 5–3 (63%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.87 1980 1733 124.0 — — — — -109 — +62 63.3% +0.80 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +1.51
22 1974 1655 122.8 — — — — +30 — -96 51.1% +0.15 3–0 (100%) — — +1.81 1981 1717 116.5 — — — — -101 — +95 43.2% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.92
23 1975 1626 110.1 — — — — +103 — — 42.3% -0.15 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.9 +1.58 1982 1632 114.6 — — — — -131 — +169 37.7% -1.00 2–7 (22%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 +1.22
24 1976 1624 114.2 — — — — +86 — -46 28.6% -1.43 1–0 0–1 — -0.62 1983 1568 97.8 — — — — -36 +18 +127 32.6% -1.30 3–2 (60%) — — +0.47
25 1977 1619 116.5 — — — — +106 — -82 51.4% +0.20 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.5 +2.87 1984 1583 111.0 — — — — -40 — +93 41.9% -0.67 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 +2.39
26 1978 1517 103.1 — — — — +118 -78 -14 17.9% -2.54 0–1 — — +0.45 1985 1571 120.1 — — — — -36 — +95 41.3% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 +2.25
27 1979 1504 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08 1986 1459 102.2 — — — — -14 — +163 26.3% -1.26 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 90.9 +0.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1412 91.7 — — — — -6 +46 — 34.5% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.71
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1454 110.8 — — — — -65 — +173 44.1% -0.91 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 97.2 +0.67
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1447 110.4 — — — — -13 — — 33.3% -0.58 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.78
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1431 95.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.21
Career — 1675 114.8 — — — — +68 -84 -39 38.4% -0.85 17–9 (65%) 5–10 (33%) 103.0 +6.48 — 1771 121.5 — — — — -37 +2 +77 44.2% -0.49 43–60 (42%) 33–39 (46%) 95.8 +6.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.