H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patricia Cody vs Maricaye Christenson H2H: 1-1
Patricia Cody and Maricaye Christenson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Cody leads 1–0 on grass, while Maricaye Christenson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maricaye Christenson won the 1974 Los Angeles Sectionals fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1974* | Los Angeles Sectionals | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Maricaye Christenson | 6-4 6-3 | Patricia Cody | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1968* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Patricia Cody | 6-1 (ret.) | Maricaye Christenson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Cody | — | — | — | 1,563 | 24 | 47 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maricaye Christenson | — | — | — | 1,503 | 23 | 56 | 29.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Cody | Maricaye Christenson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 3–15 | 16.7% | — | 1,399 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1968 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1969 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1970 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1971 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1972 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1973 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |