H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Ann Grossman H2H: 1-1
Patricia Hy Boulais and Ann Grossman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1996 Canadian Open second round 4-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1996* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1995* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-4 7-5 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Hy Boulais | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |