H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Patricia Hy Boulais vs Debbie Graham H2H: 2-1

Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 2–1 lead over Debbie Graham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1995 British Clay Court Champs round of 16 5-7 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Debbie Graham
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 5-7 6-3 6-1 Debbie Graham #75 Match data May 19, 1995* R16 British Clay Court Champs Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-3 6-1 Debbie Graham #62 Match data Nov 6, 1993* QF Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Debbie Graham #58 6-3 6-1 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Jan 15, 1993* R16 Melbourne Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Debbie Graham #729 #35 190 1,757 83 90 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Debbie Graham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
17 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0 1988 3–2 60.0% #138 1,547 0 0
18 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0 1989 2–4 33.3% #256 1,512 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 5–4 55.6% #121 1,581 0 0
20 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1 1991 14–11 56.0% #42 1,685 0 0
21 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1 1992 21–19 52.5% #51 1,728 0 0
22 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1 1993 21–22 48.8% #65 1,683 0 0
23 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1 1994 8–10 44.4% #68 1,698 0 0
24 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1 1995 4–12 25.0% #131 1,598 0 0
25 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1 1996 4–5 44.4% #122 1,607 0 0
26 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Debbie Graham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 12 10 22 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 54 50 104 51.9% 19 21 40 47.5% 1 8 9 11.1% 9 11 20 45.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Debbie Graham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18 1987 1502 96.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.39
17 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93 1988 1548 116.6 — — — — +36 — — 58.3% +0.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.73
18 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1989 1512 95.4 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +1.17
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1582 122.4 — — — — +23 -2 — 52.4% -0.52 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.27
20 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61 1991 1686 138.0 — — — — +16 -85 — 56.6% +0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–0 (100%) 98.8 +1.00
21 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17 1992 1729 136.9 — — — — +3 -79 — 51.6% +0.15 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 100.3 -1.24
22 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27 1993 1684 134.3 — — — — +3 +30 — 49.5% -0.04 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.7 -0.72
23 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31 1994 1699 133.9 — — — — +10 — — 48.8% -0.05 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +0.20
24 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67 1995 1599 119.1 — — — — +85 +25 — 37.1% -0.69 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.6 -0.23
25 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45 1996 1608 118.4 — — — — +59 — — 42.9% +0.10 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.30
26 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72 — 1757 137.8 — — — — +19 -14 — 49.4% -0.03 21–28 (43%) 14–14 (50%) 96.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.