H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Eugenia Maniokova H2H: 1-1
Patricia Hy Boulais and Eugenia Maniokova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eugenia Maniokova leads 1–0 on clay, while Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eugenia Maniokova won the 1995 Amelia Island second round 2-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1995* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Eugenia Maniokova | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1991* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Eugenia Maniokova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Eugenia Maniokova | #579 | #66 | 18 | 1,587 | 22 | 48 | 31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Hy Boulais | Eugenia Maniokova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #107 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #87 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #163 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #116 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #166 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |