H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-1
Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1993 Schenectady third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1993* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 7-5 6-2 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Hy Boulais | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |