H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Patricia Hy Boulais vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1997 Amelia Island third round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 10, 1997* Amelia Island WTA 250 R32 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #12 6-3 6-0 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Jun 19, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-3 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Sep 20, 1991* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 R16 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-1 6-1 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Jan 10, 1991* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #4 6-4 6-1 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1 — — — — — — —