H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patricia Hy Boulais vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-0

Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 2–0 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1994 Manhattan Beach round of 32 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Mercedes Paz
ARG Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-0 6-4 Mercedes Paz #159 Match data Aug 11, 1994* R32 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-4 6-2 Mercedes Paz #33 Match data Jan 9, 1991* R64 Sydney International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mercedes Paz #521 #28 185 1,822 145 184 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Mercedes Paz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 1985 7–11 38.9% #115 1,526 0 1
20 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1 1986 22–23 48.9% #60 1,577 0 1
21 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1 1987 15–20 42.9% #88 1,637 0 1
22 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1 1988 24–15 61.5% #44 1,779 0 2
23 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1 1989 13–19 40.6% #91 1,647 0 2
24 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1 1990 25–20 55.6% #32 1,775 0 3
25 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1 1991 19–23 45.2% #71 1,683 0 3
26 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1 1992 10–19 34.5% #107 1,606 0 3
27 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1 1993 2–11 15.4% #213 1,491 0 3
28 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1 1994 3–10 23.1% #140 1,474 0 3
29 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1 1995 4–8 33.3% #164 1,451 0 3
30 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1 1996 1–5 16.7% #124 1,442 0 3
31 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Mercedes Paz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 1986 8 10 18 44.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — —
23 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 6 6 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
25 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 0 5 5 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 41 57 98 41.8% 93 98 191 48.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 8 17 25 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Mercedes Paz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1526 110.7 — — — — +40 +38 — 40.9% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.74
20 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61 1986 1577 119.8 — — — — -30 +125 — 50.5% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +3.38
21 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17 1987 1637 131.6 — — — — -16 +33 — 45.6% -0.18 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.70
22 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27 1988 1780 134.3 — — — — -56 -13 — 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 4–3 (57%) 106.9 +0.57
23 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31 1989 1648 125.8 — — — — -60 +126 — 45.9% -0.22 2–8 (20%) 8–7 (53%) 94.4 +0.43
24 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67 1990 1776 143.2 — — — — -121 +116 — 54.3% +0.15 8–9 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 101.6 -2.36
25 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45 1991 1684 124.3 — — — — +2 +72 — 45.2% -0.53 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +1.48
26 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82 1992 1606 128.7 — — — — -21 +95 — 42.6% -0.54 1–9 (10%) 2–1 (67%) 91.7 -1.41
27 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32 1993 1491 102.6 — — — — +47 +87 — 24.1% -1.38 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.61
28 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60 1994 1474 115.3 — — — — +29 +93 — 22.2% -1.81 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
29 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06 1995 1452 102.8 — — — — +50 +58 — 36.0% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.83
30 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41 1996 1442 97.8 — — — — — +17 — 16.7% -2.67 — 0–1 — +0.03
31 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72 — 1822 131.0 — — — — -28 +76 — 45.9% -0.29 37–61 (38%) 38–33 (54%) 96.4 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.