H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-0
Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 2–0 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1994 Manhattan Beach third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1994* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-0 6-4 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1991* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-4 6-2 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Hy Boulais | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |