H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Patricia Hy Boulais vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 0-2

Meredith Mcgrath holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meredith Mcgrath leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1998 Oklahoma round of 32 6-3 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Meredith Mcgrath
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meredith Mcgrath 6-3 5-7 6-2 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Feb 26, 1998* R32 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Meredith Mcgrath #21 6-4 6-3 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Oct 31, 1996* R32 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,516 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0
22 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
26 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,895 0 3
28 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Meredith Mcgrath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 1991 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 36 43 79 45.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 29 15 44 65.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Meredith Mcgrath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93 1988 1497 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1989 1517 113.0 — — — — +50 — +23 34.4% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — +0.67
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1709 138.3 — — — — +2 — -93 54.1% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 104.9 -0.50
20 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61 1991 1679 124.7 — — — — +46 — — 44.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.42
21 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17 1992 1658 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
22 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27 1993 1708 131.5 — — — — -20 — -17 49.1% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 100.0 -0.63
23 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31 1994 1768 146.2 — — — — -39 -242 +61 52.9% +0.14 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 110.7 -2.14
24 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67 1995 1742 142.5 — — — — +5 -174 — 49.1% +0.21 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.72
25 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45 1996 1917 143.6 — — — — -150 -312 +118 63.9% +0.89 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 105.3 -1.70
26 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32 1998 1895 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.03
28 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72 — 1928 144.8 — — — — -13 -243 +39 51.0% +0.12 28–22 (56%) 13–21 (38%) 105.1 -2.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.