H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Min Tang H2H: 1-0
Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 1–0 lead over Min Tang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1995 British Clay Court Champs third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1995* | British Clay Court Champs | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-2 6-2 | Min Tang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Min Tang | #747 | #112 | 13 | 1,565 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patricia Hy Boulais | Min Tang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |