H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Natalia Baudone H2H: 1-1
Patricia Hy Boulais and Natalia Baudone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natalia Baudone leads 1–0 on clay, while Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1995 Canadian Open second round 7-6 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 7-6 1-6 6-1 | Natalia Baudone | Match data |
| May 6, 1992* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Natalia Baudone | 6-2 6-4 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patricia Hy Boulais | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |