H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais and Natalia Baudone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natalia Baudone leads 1–0 on clay, while Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1995 Canadian Open round of 64 7-6 1-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | 7-6 1-6 6-1 | Natalia Baudone | Match data | Aug 16, 1995* | R64 | Canadian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Natalia Baudone | 6-2 6-4 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data | May 6, 1992* | R64 | Italian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,906 | 142 | 165 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patricia Hy Boulais | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Patricia Hy Boulais | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1986 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 1994 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1995 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 72 | 85 | 157 | 45.9% | 28 | 39 | 67 | 41.8% | 27 | 23 | 50 | 54.0% | 15 | 18 | 33 | 45.5% | Career | 21 | 29 | 50 | 42.0% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Patricia Hy Boulais | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1981 | 1493 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 1990 | 1502 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.23 |
| 1982 | 1477 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.18 | 1991 | 1465 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.01 |
| 1983 | 1546 | 117.5 | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | +83 | 46.9% | +0.12 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.93 | 1992 | 1538 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +28 | — | 44.4% | -0.67 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.42 |
| 1984 | 1523 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.06 | 1993 | 1578 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -7 | — | 41.5% | -0.89 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 105.4 | -0.23 |
| 1986 | 1633 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | — | 69.6% | +1.65 | 5–0 (100%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +2.61 | 1994 | 1650 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 48.7% | -0.31 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.8 | -0.82 |
| 1987 | 1595 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | +10 | 37.5% | -0.93 | 5–3 (63%) | 1–6 (14%) | 97.9 | -0.17 | 1995 | 1662 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -56 | — | 45.7% | -0.43 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | 92.4 | -0.25 |
| 1988 | 1548 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.27 | 1996 | 1626 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -80 | — | 30.4% | -1.70 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.04 |
| 1989 | 1515 | 91.9 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.30 | — | — | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1574 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | +7 | — | — | 51.7% | +0.41 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1704 | 141.1 | — | — | — | — | -20 | -265 | +2 | 50.0% | +0.11 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.8 | -0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1877 | 155.6 | — | — | — | — | -71 | -231 | -109 | 56.3% | +0.35 | 7–3 (70%) | 2–2 (50%) | 107.4 | -1.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1852 | 141.8 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -170 | +3 | 57.0% | +0.38 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–3 (57%) | 105.0 | -1.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1756 | 132.7 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -99 | — | 52.4% | +0.25 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.3 | -0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1691 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -27 | — | 50.0% | -0.18 | 3–9 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 93.7 | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 1687 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -41 | +161 | 40.0% | -0.73 | 4–4 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.0 | -1.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1664 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | -71 | +1 | +194 | 40.3% | -0.58 | 8–7 (53%) | 2–5 (29%) | 99.0 | -0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 1574 | 92.9 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -9 | — | 26.1% | -2.00 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–1 | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1906 | 138.1 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -116 | +43 | 47.1% | -0.18 | 50–44 (53%) | 22–33 (40%) | 98.3 | -0.72 | Career | 1682 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -15 | — | 42.4% | -0.76 | 13–19 (41%) | 8–12 (40%) | 97.6 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | 1 | 9 | 10 | Jul 3, 1996 | H2H |
| Gabriela Sabatini | 0 | 7 | 7 | Aug 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 21, 1998 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 3 | 2 | 5 | May 22, 1997 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 0 | 5 | 5 | Apr 10, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karina Habsudova | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 11, 1995 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Linda Wild | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 21, 1994 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 1995 | H2H |