H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Patricia Hy Boulais vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 1-0

Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Jagerman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1987 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-7 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Jagerman
NED Age 59 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-7 7-5 7-5 Nicole Jagerman #108 Match data Feb 24, 1987* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nicole Jagerman #685 #43 24 1,735 81 100 44.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Nicole Jagerman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0 1986 9–4 69.2% #106 1,606 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1987 0–10 0.0% #206 1,479 0 0
20 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1 1988 11–10 52.4% #72 1,582 0 0
21 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1 1989 13–15 46.4% #82 1,658 0 0
22 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1 1990 12–13 48.0% #68 1,698 0 0
23 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1 1991 10–11 47.6% #67 1,690 0 0
24 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1 1992 9–14 39.1% #115 1,632 0 0
25 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1 1993 12–11 52.2% #68 1,682 0 0
26 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1 1994 4–11 26.7% #137 1,590 0 0
27 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1 1995 1–1 50.0% #215 1,608 0 0
28 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Nicole Jagerman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
20 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 21 32 53 39.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 2 10 12 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Nicole Jagerman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1986 1607 116.3 — — — — 0 +33 — 63.3% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 106.5 +1.74
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1480 96.7 — — — — — +55 +35 9.1% -2.55 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.44
20 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61 1988 1582 121.0 — — — — +4 +31 — 50.0% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 4–1 (80%) 106.2 +0.50
21 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17 1989 1659 133.0 — — — — -114 +87 — 45.5% -0.17 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 104.0 +0.22
22 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27 1990 1698 130.7 — — — — -75 +4 — 49.1% -0.57 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -1.74
23 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31 1991 1691 126.0 — — — — — +73 -152 42.2% -0.56 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.09
24 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67 1992 1632 128.5 — — — — -36 +72 — 42.0% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 97.4 -0.22
25 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45 1993 1683 131.2 — — — — -33 +15 — 51.0% +0.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 +0.14
26 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82 1994 1590 112.1 — — — — +10 +71 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.31
27 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32 1995 1608 114.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.38
28 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72 — 1736 132.3 — — — — -41 +52 -59 44.5% -0.39 21–21 (50%) 23–15 (61%) 107.3 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.