H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 1-1
Patricia Hy Boulais and Pilar Vasquez are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1983 US Open third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Pilar Vasquez | 6-4 6-2 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| Mar 3, 1983* | Nashville | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-1 6-0 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Hy Boulais | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |