H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patricia Hy Boulais vs Sabine Hack H2H: 0-3
Sabine Hack holds a 3–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sabine Hack leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1996 Auckland third round 6-3 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 1996* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sabine Hack | 6-3 2-6 6-1 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| May 12, 1994* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-2 6-0 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| May 12, 1993* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sabine Hack | 6-2 6-0 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Hy Boulais | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |