H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Patricia Hy Boulais vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1994 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Hy Boulais
Age 60 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Sandra Cecchini #50 6-2 6-4 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data
Sep 4, 1987* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Sandra Cecchini #29 6-4 5-7 7-5 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,907 140 163 46.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,530 0 1 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,500 0 1 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,565 0 1 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,702 0 1 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1992 21–15 58.3% — 1,878 0 1 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,852 0 1 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1996 9–15 37.5% — 1,678 0 1 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,660 0 1 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,571 0 1 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11