H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Patricia Hy Boulais vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1994 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #50 6-2 6-4 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Jun 22, 1994* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Sandra Cecchini #29 6-4 5-7 7-5 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Sep 4, 1987* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patricia Hy Boulais Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.