H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patricia Tarabini vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 1-2
Isabel Cueto holds a 2–1 lead over Patricia Tarabini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1990 Amelia Island second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1990* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-4 6-2 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1989* | Archaron | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Patricia Tarabini | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1988* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Patricia Tarabini | 6-1 6-1 | Isabel Cueto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Tarabini | #617 | #29 | 29 | 1,743 | 104 | 122 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Tarabini | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #108 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #36 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1989 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #60 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1991 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #100 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #126 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1993 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #104 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |