H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patricia Walkden vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 3-2
Patricia Walkden holds a 3–2 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Patricia Walkden leads 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Walkden won the 1970 Rome third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1970* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Walkden | 6-4 7-5 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1970* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Walkden | (w/o) | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Jun 3, 1969* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Patricia Walkden | 6-8 6-4 6-3 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| May 16, 1969* | Hurlingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-3 6-1 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
| May 10, 1969* | Guildford | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Tory Ann Fretz | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Patricia Walkden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Walkden | — | — | — | 1,941 | 218 | 104 | 67.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Walkden | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 1968 | 48–23 | 67.6% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1969 | 53–18 | 74.6% | — | 1,879 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1970 | 49–24 | 67.1% | — | 1,888 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1971 | 9–3 | 75.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 9 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 31–17 | 64.6% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 12 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 12 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 12 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |