H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patricia Wartusch vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 0-1
Laurence Courtois holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Wartusch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laurence Courtois leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laurence Courtois won the 2001 Indian Wells first round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2001* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Laurence Courtois | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Patricia Wartusch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Wartusch | #1,235 | #65 | 512 | 1,641 | 43 | 61 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Wartusch | Laurence Courtois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #90 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #150 | 1,467 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,513 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |