H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Cecilia Martinez H2H: 2-0
Patti Hogan holds a 2–0 lead over Cecilia Martinez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patti Hogan leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patti Hogan won the 1971 Fulham third round 1-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1971* | Fulham | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patti Hogan | 1-6 6-2 6-3 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1968* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-2 6-4 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,710 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patti Hogan | Cecilia Martinez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |