H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Chris Oneil H2H: 3-1
Patti Hogan holds a 3–1 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Patti Hogan leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Patti Hogan won the 1975 Surbiton quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1975* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-3 6-4 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| May 24, 1975* | Guildford | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Patti Hogan | 8-6 6-1 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1974* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-3 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
| May 18, 1974* | Guildford | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Chris Oneil | 9-7 1-6 6-3 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patti Hogan | Chris Oneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 |
| 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 |
| 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 |
| 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 |
| 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 |
| 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 |
| 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 |