H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Esme Emmanuel H2H: 3-1
Patti Hogan holds a 3–1 lead over Esme Emmanuel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patti Hogan leads 2–0 on grass, while Esme Emmanuel leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patti Hogan won the 1972 Manchester final 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Age 79
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1972* | Manchester | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-2 6-3 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1971* | Manchester | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1969* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Patti Hogan | 6-2 6-4 | Esme Emmanuel | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1969* | Agawam | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Esme Emmanuel | 6-3 7-5 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Esme Emmanuel | — | — | — | 1,766 | 77 | 85 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patti Hogan | Esme Emmanuel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 4–17 | 19.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |