H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Linda Tuero H2H: 2-2
Patti Hogan and Linda Tuero are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patti Hogan leads 2–0 on grass, while Linda Tuero leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1973 Akron fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1973* | Akron | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Linda Tuero | 6-3 6-1 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-1 6-4 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1972* | Durban | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Linda Tuero | 6-0 6-3 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1969* | Orange | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-0 6-2 | Linda Tuero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patti Hogan | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 23 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |