H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Lindsay Blachford H2H: 1-2
Lindsay Blachford holds a 2–1 lead over Patti Hogan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Lindsay Blachford leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Blachford won the 1974 Torquay quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 1974* | Torquay | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Lindsay Blachford | 6-4 7-5 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Nov 3, 1972* | Port Talbot | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Patti Hogan | 6-2 2-6 6-0 | Lindsay Blachford | Match data |
| Jul 21, 1972* | West Kirby | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lindsay Blachford | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Lindsay Blachford | — | — | — | 1,636 | 55 | 79 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patti Hogan | Lindsay Blachford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |