H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Maricaye Christenson H2H: 2-1
Patti Hogan holds a 2–1 lead over Maricaye Christenson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patti Hogan leads 2–0 on grass, while Maricaye Christenson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patti Hogan won the 1969 Orange fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 78
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 1969* | Orange | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-2 6-1 | Maricaye Christenson | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1968* | La Jolla Nationals | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Maricaye Christenson | 7-5 6-3 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1968* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 6-1 6-1 | Maricaye Christenson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Maricaye Christenson | — | — | — | 1,503 | 23 | 56 | 29.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patti Hogan | Maricaye Christenson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 3–15 | 16.7% | — | 1,399 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,413 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |