H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Patti Hogan vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 3-1

Patti Hogan holds a 3–1 lead over Pam Teeguarden in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patti Hogan leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Patti Hogan won the 1972 Wimbledon round of 16 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patti Hogan
USA Age 76 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patti Hogan 6-3 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data Jul 5, 1972* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Pam Teeguarden 6-1 6-3 Patti Hogan Match data Feb 25, 1970* QF Agawam WTA 250 Hard
Patti Hogan 6-1 5-7 8-6 Pam Teeguarden Match data Aug 18, 1969* R64 Chestnut Hill WTA 250 Grass
Patti Hogan 6-3 1-6 6-4 Pam Teeguarden Match data May 11, 1968* QF Los Angeles Socal Chps WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patti Hogan — — — 2,014 280 186 60.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patti Hogan Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 1968 32–17 65.3% — 1,632 0 1 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 1969 42–24 63.6% — 1,793 0 2 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 1970 55–30 64.7% — 1,913 0 3 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 1971 41–29 58.6% — 1,796 0 4 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 1972 25–18 58.1% — 1,747 0 5 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 1973 28–22 56.0% — 1,722 0 6 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,706 0 6 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 1975 24–18 57.1% — 1,710 0 6 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 1976 3–5 37.5% — 1,659 0 6 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 1977 2–2 50.0% — 1,636 0 6 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,613 0 6 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,607 0 6 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patti Hogan Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 1968 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 21 13 34 61.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 1969 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 25 11 36 69.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1970 7 4 11 63.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 31 12 43 72.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1971 8 4 12 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 1972 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 17 6 23 73.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1973 2 2 4 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1974 — — — — 9 10 19 47.4% 17 7 24 70.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1975 0 3 3 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 14 4 18 77.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1976 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1977 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 37 23 60 61.7% 54 47 101 53.5% 168 80 248 67.7% 18 34 52 34.6% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patti Hogan Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 1968 1633 117.5 — — — — +94 — +58 61.1% +0.71 10–5 (67%) — — -0.22 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 1969 1793 129.5 — — — — +6 -273 +69 58.7% +0.63 16–7 (70%) — — -1.22 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 1970 1913 145.1 — — — — -91 -184 +119 60.0% +0.66 20–6 (77%) 1–2 (33%) 111.6 -8.27 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 1971 1796 139.4 — — — — -27 -1 +139 57.6% +0.56 13–9 (59%) 3–4 (43%) 101.4 -1.76 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 1972 1748 130.5 — — — — -51 -15 +171 58.5% +0.64 4–7 (36%) 0–1 — +1.94 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 1973 1723 131.2 — — — — -154 -5 +252 55.8% +0.17 6–9 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 93.6 +0.12 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 1974 1706 126.0 — — — — -157 -66 +238 58.9% +0.69 6–9 (40%) 1–1 — +4.18 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 1975 1711 129.9 — — — — -137 -64 +211 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 0–1 — +0.75 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 1976 1660 106.8 — — — — — — +240 38.9% -0.95 1–1 — — +1.17 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 1977 1637 101.9 — — — — — — +199 50.0% +0.20 1–1 — — +0.69 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 1978 1614 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.03 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 1979 1608 102.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.49 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
Career — 2015 135.6 — — — — -44 -87 +145 57.8% +0.52 84–60 (58%) 6–11 (35%) 100.5 -0.46 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.