H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Penny Moor H2H: 1-2
Penny Moor holds a 2–1 lead over Patti Hogan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Penny Moor leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Penny Moor won the 1973 Guildford third round 7-5 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1973* | Guildford | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Penny Moor | 7-5 0-6 6-3 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1971* | Torquay | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Penny Moor | 6-1 6-3 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1970* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Patti Hogan | 6-3 6-4 | Penny Moor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Penny Moor | — | — | — | 1,552 | 53 | 111 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patti Hogan | Penny Moor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 7–21 | 25.0% | — | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |