H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Patti Hogan vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 3-1
Patti Hogan holds a 3–1 lead over Tory Ann Fretz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patti Hogan leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Tory Ann Fretz leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patti Hogan won the 1971 West Kirby fourth round 9-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Age 83
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1971* | West Kirby | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Patti Hogan | 9-7 6-4 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1969* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-2 6-3 | Patti Hogan | Match data |
| May 12, 1968* | Los Angeles Socal Chps | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Patti Hogan | 6-2 8-6 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
| Mar 17, 1968* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Patti Hogan | 6-2 6-4 | Tory Ann Fretz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patti Hogan | — | — | — | 2,010 | 280 | 186 | 60.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patti Hogan | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 32–17 | 65.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 42–24 | 63.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 55–30 | 64.7% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 41–29 | 58.6% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 25–18 | 58.1% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–18 | 57.1% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |