H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Patty Fendick vs Ann Grossman H2H: 3-3

Patty Fendick and Ann Grossman are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1995 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Patty Fendick #53 6-1 6-2 Ann Grossman #37 Match data
May 26, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Ann Grossman #36 2-6 6-3 6-0 Patty Fendick #27 Match data
Jan 22, 1993* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Patty Fendick #40 6-1 7-6(6) Ann Grossman #37 Match data
May 27, 1992* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Ann Grossman #52 6-3 6-3 Patty Fendick #66 Match data
Aug 4, 1989* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Ann Grossman #47 3-6 7-5 6-0 Patty Fendick #23 Match data
Jan 13, 1989* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Patty Fendick #21 6-4 6-2 Ann Grossman #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,888 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Fendick Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,749 0 0
20 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,636 0 0
21 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,734 0 0
22 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,810 0 0
23 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,664 0 0
26 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3 — — — — — — —