H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Patty Fendick vs Ann Grossman H2H: 3-3

Patty Fendick and Ann Grossman are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Ann Grossman leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1995 Australian Open round of 128 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Fendick #53 6-1 6-2 Ann Grossman #37 Match data Jan 18, 1995* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Ann Grossman #36 2-6 6-3 6-0 Patty Fendick #27 Match data May 26, 1993* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Patty Fendick #40 6-1 7-6(6) Ann Grossman #37 Match data Jan 22, 1993* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Ann Grossman #52 6-3 6-3 Patty Fendick #66 Match data May 27, 1992* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Ann Grossman #47 3-6 7-5 6-0 Patty Fendick #23 Match data Aug 4, 1989* R16 San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Patty Fendick #21 6-4 6-2 Ann Grossman #48 Match data Jan 13, 1989* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Fendick Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,550 0 0 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,739 0 3 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,689 0 3 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,778 0 3 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,724 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patty Fendick Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1983 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1984 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1987 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1988 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1989 19 8 27 70.4% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1990 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1991 9 13 22 40.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1992 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 93 222 58.1% 10 14 24 41.7% 39 31 70 55.7% 21 24 45 46.7% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patty Fendick Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1982 1500 107.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.32 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1983 1430 95.2 — — — — +124 +81 — 27.3% -1.46 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — +0.97 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1984 1471 109.1 — — — — +101 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 — — +0.32 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1985 1551 125.3 — — — — +52 — +31 47.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.32 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1986 1643 127.4 — — — — -7 — -4 58.6% +1.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.36 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1987 1674 134.5 — — — — -15 — -12 47.5% +0.10 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — -0.36 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1988 1798 142.2 — — — — +11 — -57 68.9% +1.29 9–6 (60%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +4.37 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1989 1763 138.6 — — — — +28 — -46 62.3% +0.83 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 +2.33 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 1990 1740 136.0 — — — — +3 — +11 54.8% +0.16 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.1 +0.10 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 1991 1690 123.1 — — — — -46 -91 +29 47.3% -0.30 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 98.7 +0.64 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1992 1779 141.8 — — — — -32 -186 +25 51.9% +0.05 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.9 -0.86 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
28 1993 1839 147.9 — — — — -9 — +30 62.1% +0.58 5–6 (45%) 8–0 (100%) 104.7 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1725 142.2 — — — — +38 — +70 55.9% +0.41 5–11 (31%) 6–4 (60%) 95.7 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1691 135.9 — — — — +70 -105 +56 51.7% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.2 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1883 144.8 — — — — +11 -97 +4 56.2% +0.38 45–57 (44%) 39–27 (59%) 101.0 +2.07 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.