H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 2-0
Patty Fendick holds a 2–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1995 Indian Wells third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1995* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 7-6 6-3 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1993* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Patty Fendick | 7-5 6-4 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Patty Fendick | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |