H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Katrina Adams H2H: 1-3
Katrina Adams holds a 3–1 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Katrina Adams leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1994 US Open first round 6-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 6-7 6-4 6-3 | Katrina Adams | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1989* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Katrina Adams | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1989* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Katrina Adams | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1988* | Wellington | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Katrina Adams | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Katrina Adams | #625 | #67 | 199 | 1,608 | 55 | 114 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Fendick | Katrina Adams | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #256 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #144 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #116 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #625 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |