H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Patty Fendick vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-4

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 4–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1995 Tokyo third round 4-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 3, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Kimiko Date Krumm 4-6 6-3 6-1 Patty Fendick #56 Match data
Jan 20, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-3 Patty Fendick #53 Match data
Jan 15, 1994* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 5-7 6-1 Patty Fendick #27 Match data
Jan 31, 1992* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R32 Carpet Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-1 Patty Fendick #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patty Fendick Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8