H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patty Fendick vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 1-2
Laura Golarsa holds a 2–1 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Laura Golarsa leads 2–0 on grass, while Patty Fendick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1994 Manhattan Beach third round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1994* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Patty Fendick | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Laura Golarsa | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1994* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Laura Golarsa | 6-4 6-2 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1993* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Laura Golarsa | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Laura Golarsa | #693 | #39 | 436 | 1,761 | 127 | 180 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patty Fendick | Laura Golarsa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #79 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #61 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #213 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #69 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #112 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #149 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #168 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 |